A great Congress was arranged to convene at Vienna in the autumn of 1814. As the proceedings of the Congress of Vienna continued amidst much lavish social festival diplomatists and statesmen redrew the map of Europe after Napoleon's downfall. A French Bourbon monarchy had been restored and was represented at Vienna by Talleyrand who gradually won acceptance from other diplomats that restoration France should be regarded as a major power with a legitimate say in the efforts to define a peace.
Although the several powers gathered at Vienna had formerly been allies in war they strenuously disagreed amongst themselves over the post war settlement of Europe. Metternich had many talents which helped him to exercise a great influence on proceedings. His charm, determination, subtlety and finesse played a key role in frustrating Russia's plans for the annexation of the whole of Poland and Prussia's attempt to absorb Saxony. He succeeded in creating a German Confederation under Austrian leadership and was broadly satisfied with the degree to which Austria was influential in the Italian peninsula. The fact that Napoleon escaped from Elba and again became leader of sizable armies that stayed in the field for some "one hundred days" may have helped to concentrate the diplomats minds on the need to reach agreement.
Metternich equally resented liberalism, nationalism, and revolution regarding them all as forms of "presumption". Metternich subscribed to a world view that dated from the "European Enlightenment". That is he accepted that there were certain fundamental laws relating to society which were open to being discovered. By governing in line with such laws rulers could have a greater hope that their societies would function in a stable and tranquil equilibrium. Metternich believed that the observation of the precepts of Religious and Social Morality to be a primary necessity to governing in line with natural laws.
In Metternich's view the printing presses had made it a lot easier to spread harmful ideas as well as beneficial ones. Such things as the invention of Gunpowder and the monetary inflation that had been experienced in Europe as the gold and silver of the Americas were imported had greatly unsettled the previous social equilibrium and prepared men's minds for the acceptance of new, and often false, ideas. Such false ideas were then "presumptuous" in that they often tended to motivate people to support socio-political movements that would seek to establish seemingly attractive adaptions of society that were not in line with the observance of fundamental laws.
Metternich's ideal was a monarchy that shared power with the traditional privileged classes of society. In efforts to preserve the sort of Europe he valued from future revolutionary eruptions, Metternich attempted to make the postwar Quadruple Alliance (Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, and Austria) into an instrument for preventing revolution in Europe. He encouraged a Congress System where representatives of the powers were to meet periodically with the view considering if it was necessary to suppress revolutionary movements. He was in favor of close supervision of the universities and an ambitious system of censorship intended to discourage radicalism of any kind. These policies left Metternich open to being depicted as an architect of Reaction and of a suppressor of Liberty. It seems that the Austrian Emperor, Francis I, was of a notably reactionary outlook and this may well have helped to restrain any modest tendency towards flexibility that Metternich might have himself favored.
Although the several powers gathered at Vienna had formerly been allies in war they strenuously disagreed amongst themselves over the post war settlement of Europe. Metternich had many talents which helped him to exercise a great influence on proceedings. His charm, determination, subtlety and finesse played a key role in frustrating Russia's plans for the annexation of the whole of Poland and Prussia's attempt to absorb Saxony. He succeeded in creating a German Confederation under Austrian leadership and was broadly satisfied with the degree to which Austria was influential in the Italian peninsula. The fact that Napoleon escaped from Elba and again became leader of sizable armies that stayed in the field for some "one hundred days" may have helped to concentrate the diplomats minds on the need to reach agreement.
Metternich equally resented liberalism, nationalism, and revolution regarding them all as forms of "presumption". Metternich subscribed to a world view that dated from the "European Enlightenment". That is he accepted that there were certain fundamental laws relating to society which were open to being discovered. By governing in line with such laws rulers could have a greater hope that their societies would function in a stable and tranquil equilibrium. Metternich believed that the observation of the precepts of Religious and Social Morality to be a primary necessity to governing in line with natural laws.
In Metternich's view the printing presses had made it a lot easier to spread harmful ideas as well as beneficial ones. Such things as the invention of Gunpowder and the monetary inflation that had been experienced in Europe as the gold and silver of the Americas were imported had greatly unsettled the previous social equilibrium and prepared men's minds for the acceptance of new, and often false, ideas. Such false ideas were then "presumptuous" in that they often tended to motivate people to support socio-political movements that would seek to establish seemingly attractive adaptions of society that were not in line with the observance of fundamental laws.
Metternich's ideal was a monarchy that shared power with the traditional privileged classes of society. In efforts to preserve the sort of Europe he valued from future revolutionary eruptions, Metternich attempted to make the postwar Quadruple Alliance (Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, and Austria) into an instrument for preventing revolution in Europe. He encouraged a Congress System where representatives of the powers were to meet periodically with the view considering if it was necessary to suppress revolutionary movements. He was in favor of close supervision of the universities and an ambitious system of censorship intended to discourage radicalism of any kind. These policies left Metternich open to being depicted as an architect of Reaction and of a suppressor of Liberty. It seems that the Austrian Emperor, Francis I, was of a notably reactionary outlook and this may well have helped to restrain any modest tendency towards flexibility that Metternich might have himself favored.
1. How did Metternich's ideas differ from the ideas of the Enlightenment?
2. Would Metternich's ideas promote peace or conflict in Europe? Explain
Metternich’s ideas differed from those of the Enlightenment. He believed that Religious and Social Morality were vital for the government. Back in the days of the Enlightenment, philosophers and scientist actually went against the ideas of the church which now Metternich is trying to bring back. Also, he thought that the printing press was a way to spread bad ideas. The Enlightenment leaders thought the printing press was very important to spread new ideas to the society faster and more efficiently. Metternich thought that the government should be a monarchy with shared power.
ReplyDeleteI believe that Metternich’s ideas would promote conflict in Europe because some people may think that he is trying to ruin everything that was worked for. For example, the printing press was a major accomplishment but Metternich looks at the negative side of this. Also, the French Revolution was about getting a voice, and that would have been taken away if there is a monarchy.
-A.S
his ideas differ from the ideas from enlightenment because In Metternich's view the printing presses had made it a lot easier to spread harmful ideas as well as beneficial ones. Such things as the invention of Gunpowder and the monetary inflation that had been experienced in Europe as the gold and silver of the Americas were imported had greatly unsettled the previous social equilibrium and prepared men's minds,
ReplyDeletehis ideas promote peace in europe because several powers gathered at Vienna had formerly been allies in war they strenuously disagreed amongst themselves over the post war settlement of Europe. Metternich had many talents which helped him to exercise a great influence on proceedings.also a great Congress was arranged to convene at Vienna in the autumn of 1814. As the proceedings of the Congress of Vienna continued amidst much lavish social festival diplomatists and statesmen redrew the map of Europe after Napoleon's downfall.
M.I
1.Metternich established a monarchy in his country, because his resenting of liberalism, nationalism, and revolution, so that he believed govern their society and country with such laws rulers could have a greater hope that their societies would function in a stable and tranquil equilibrium. That's definitely different from the of Enlightenment, the idea of Enlightenment advocated liberty and democracy in government.
ReplyDelete2.I think that would conflict in Europe, that would cause chaos just like the French Revolution. People may think about rebel to the government because of there were too many strict controlling.
----------ZhaoJi Wu
1. The enlightenment was a break away from dogmatic religious institutions by philosophers and scientists and the great awakening was a revitalization of the popularity of dogmatic religious institutions (in America).
ReplyDeleteThe idea of a balance of power amongst the five strongest European states- Great Britain, France, Prussia, Austria, and Russia. Also, the idea that the European nations had to help each other out so that things would remain status quote. This led to a failure of most revolutions in the 19th Century , and about 100 years "peace" in Europe.
2. Metternich's ideas would promote peace in Europe because if there's a balance of power then no one will go against each other. For example, like comparing each other by saying that I have more power than the other parties!
_FC
C.E.
ReplyDeleteMetternich's idea differ from the ideas of the Enlightenment because he wanted to share power to the other ideal classes of society. He wanted everyone to have equal rights and had the same privilege. Metternich was mostly focused on how he can quadruple the postwar society. What he really wanted was a alliance with the other surrounding countries in Europe. He was mostly into the censorship towards others in participation of people would agree of another government.
Metternich's idea would actually promote peace in Europe because he is giving everyone equal rights to other countries. Also, he is showing a fair debate of how the idea of having a superior and fair governor would work. Metternich is trying to tell everyone that they should support their alliances with a fair share of government. A portion of peace will also be given to them as well. He discussed that representatives must require a certain amount of power for their needs.
10/1/13
1. Metternich’s ideals differed from the the ideas from the enlightenment. Metternich supported a monarchy. However the enlightenment promoted different version of freedom, a democracy.Not only did Metternich support a monarchy, but he wanted a government where the wealthy triumphed. As you can see, his ideas differ from the enlightenment’s ideas.
ReplyDelete2. Meternich’s ideas could bring peace or conlifct in Europe. However, I believe that it would probably be worse, because he still wants a monarchy. People want democracy and freedom. Letting Metternich become ruler defeats the purpose of an equal voice for everyone. Even if he was a good ruler, I think that commoners would not be happy, especially if people with more money have more power. Metternich would have too much power, and eventually, like most rulers, abuse it.
e.l.
Metternich's ideas differ from the ideas of the Enlightenment. Metternich's ideal was a monarchy that shared power. But in the enlightenment doesn't want a monarchy. The enlightenment shares ideas and knowledge of how man should live without a government. Metternich wants a congress system and want someone to rule over the people.
ReplyDeleteMetternich's ideas would promote peace in Europe. Metternich want laws, laws will benefit the people because they will know what is wrong and what is right. If Europe have a good and fair monarchy then people will be calm and do the right thing. But if Europe have a bad monarchy then there will be reformers and riots. We can't really stop a place from having reformers, everywhere there is going to be someone who wants change.
-EP
1. Metternich did not support libertisim and nationalism to ideas brought about by the enlightenment.
ReplyDelete2. Metternich's idea's were to prevent future issues in Europe. However he also wanted to bring back the absolute monarchy. If he would have brought back absolute monarchy it would male the french revolution pointless. The reason for this is that the whole french revolution was about getting freedom from the royals. so if the absolute monarchy were brought back it would make the french very upset. and ultimately the french would have to redo what ever they did during the french revolution to get what they desperately wanted.
-GG
1. Metternich's ideal was a monarchy that shared power with the traditional privileged classes of society, but age of Enlightenment people think that society should be controlled by the people instead of monarch.
ReplyDelete2.i think Metternich will promote peace because he the postwar Quadruple Alliance into an instrument for preventing revolution in Europe, so people in Europe will live peacefully
Z,L
J,L
-KZ
ReplyDelete1) As a diplomatist, Metternich's idea is that religious and social morality is the first primary necessities to governing in line with natural laws, he also believes that some fundamental laws relating to society which were open to being discovered. The Enlightenment is making people separating from the church and look forward to knowledge.
2) Metternich's idea is different from the Enlightenment, but he still brought some good changes to Europe, as a successful diplomatist during the end of French Revolution, he encouraged the congress system where representatives of the powers were to meet periodically depends on the necessarily .
Metternich's ideas differ from the ideas of the Enlightenment because preferred a monarchical society or in other words he found it ideal. Also, he attempted to make the postwar Quadruple Alliance that would prevent revolution in Europe. This differs from the ideas since the ideas of the Enlightenment were influential in the creation of the Revolution. Metternich was in favor of close supervision to discourage radicalism of any kind. This means to me that he wanted to suppress liberty or in other words freedom.
ReplyDeleteIn Europe, Metternich's idea in my opinion would probably promote peace. The reason for that is because of the postwar Quadruple Alliance. The Quadruple Alliance was an alliance made of Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, and Austria, and this alliance was used to prevent revolution in Europe. It would promote peace because if one countries people started revolting against its king and queen, the other countries could come and help prevent it or stop it from happening. This is a very good and effective method of promoting peace since the less revolting there is, the less chance of some kind of war can be possible.
-SLi
1. Metternich’s ideas differ from the ideas of the Enlightenment by the way he thought of religion. He believed that religion and the Social Morality is a necessity to govern in line with natural laws. As to the Enlightenment who believed that there is a God but, does not intervene with one's daily life.
ReplyDelete2. Metternich’s ideas promote peace in Europe. He attempted to use the postwar Quadruple Alliance to prevent future revolutions. Metternich also encouraged the representatives of the powers to meet regularly to discuss revolutionary movements.
S.L.
1. Metternich's ideas differed from the ideas of the Enlightenment in many ways. In one case, he resented the ideas of liberalism, nationalism, and revolution, and believed that a monarchy would be best. He was a conservative politician and believed in past governments. He was fond of the Church, monarchy, and aristocracy. Metternich believed that it would sooner or later lead to war.
ReplyDelete2. Metternich's intentions and ideas were good, however instead of promoting peace, it may have created conflict. For instance, the printing presses. Although some good ideas were passed through it, bad ideas always overcome the good ones. False ideas tended to motivate people to support socio-political movements in which harmed the people in general.
-J.L
Metternich's ideas were radically different then that of the Enlightenment. He believed, essentially, that so called "Enlightened" ideas were cancerous. A poison, that, if left unchecked, would destroy the essence of Europe that had come to be the standard for hundreds of years. He believed that anything other than Monarchs ruling would result in civil discord, and eventually, the ruin of great countries. He strongly believed that the people should not have a say, and simply be content with the conditions in which they were born into.
ReplyDeleteHis ideas would primarily promote peace, though a very cordially, and uneasy peace. It would essentially force down any revolutions, and forward thinking, in favour of the ways of old. Many people would likely needlessly die, and really, it would create a big problem down the line for Europe. His "Holy Alliance" would simply lead to a lot of countries going to war for pointless reasons. And, strangely enough, that happened! It basically ended up with the occurrence of World War I, given the alliances he had, and by proxy, had not formed. It only created mass destruction, basically. - K.B.
Metternich's main idea was to stabilize all of Europe after Napoleon had dominated. He didn't believe that having a revolution between all these countries was going to help anything. His idea was a monarchy that was culturally diverse and shared with all of society. I believe his idea is going to bring peace because his ideas is not just for the government or for the upper class, but its for everyone. He wants to bring peace and stability to the countries. He wants prevent any revolution from happening in Europe, so he persuaded a Congress System where representatives of the powers were to meet often to talk about the importance of whether to have a revolution or not. He believe in close supervision of the universities and discouraged radicalism which was to change society by revolutionary movements. He didn't believe in revolution to help change society, but rather improve it by sharing power with other traditional classes.
ReplyDelete-S.A
Metternich’s ideas differed from the ideas of the Enlightenment. Even though he meant no harm when he shared his ideas of having an alliance and sharing power with the privileged, the ideas seem unfair to all of society. The Enlightenment was all about sharing ideas, but not just ideas from the upper class, but ideas from everyone, even the third estate. The Enlightenment strived for equal rights to everyone because they deserve it. Metternich’s idea differs from that because his idea strived for power for just a small portion of society.
ReplyDeleteMetternich’s ideas would promote conflict in Europe. Considering the time period, the last thing France would want is for there to be more power to political leaders. After the time period of Napoleon ruling, people would be almost scared for people to be in absolute power. One of the aspects the French Revolution was based upon was more rights for the third estate. If Metternich’s idea went through, the third estate would get the opposite of what they asked for.
- NQ
Metternich’s ideas differed from the ideas of the Enlightenment. Even though he meant no harm when he shared his ideas of having an alliance and sharing power with the privileged, the ideas seem unfair to all of society. The Enlightenment was all about sharing ideas, but not just ideas from the upper class, but ideas from everyone, even the third estate. The Enlightenment strived for equal rights to everyone because they deserve it. Metternich’s idea differs from that because his idea strived for power for just a small portion of society.
ReplyDeleteMetternich’s ideas would promote conflict in Europe. Considering the time period, the last thing France would want is for there to be more power to political leaders. After the time period of Napoleon ruling, people would be almost scared for people to be in absolute power. One of the aspects the French Revolution was based upon was more rights for the third estate. If Metternich’s idea went through, the third estate would get the opposite of what they asked for.
- NQ